Myok Compras
Digitize and control public procurement in a traceable platform, reducing spreadsheets, emails and manual work from the initial request to the final minutes.
Myok Compras
Many public procurement processes are still managed across spreadsheets, emails, manual documents and duplicate versions. This increases administrative workload, raises the risk of errors and makes it harder to maintain clear traceability throughout the process. When an internal review, audit or oversight request arrives, reconstructing what was decided, who was involved and which background information supported the decision can take too much time.
Myok Compras centralizes the process in a digital, structured and auditable flow, from the initial request through evaluation, document generation, minutes and closure.
Mercado Público publishes. Everything else lives in spreadsheets and emails.
The request arrives incomplete and goes back. Every round trip is days nobody records.
Nobody knows what stage a purchase is at or whose turn it is. You find out by asking.
The record gets assembled when someone asks for it. Whatever was not written down is gone.
The same data is typed three times: in the request, in the document and in the portal.
Each person logs in and sees what is waiting for them, according to their role. The approval chain is defined once, at implementation, and everyone gets their own part by email and inside the system.
With the information already captured, the system issues the documents the institution uploads to Mercado Público. Nobody copies the same data into a Word template again.
Request record, technical specifications and whatever annexes the institution uses, with its letterhead and numbering.
Each document carries the signature block of whoever corresponds, taken from the account that issues it.
Myok Compras
Myok Compras organizes evaluation so admissibility, weighted scoring and ranking are consistent, verifiable and easy to review.
Minimum requirements with pass / fail status
Evaluable criteria with percentage and scoring options
Technical score, price score and weighted total calculation
Automated final ranking with criteria traceability
Standardizes the initial request intake so the requesting unit provides complete, comparable data that is ready to move forward.
Guided form for needs, products, quantities and technical specifications
Consistent fields for budget, currency, requesting unit and owners
Fewer later corrections due to incomplete background information
Initial information reused in documents and evaluation
Gives clear visibility into each procurement process so procurement teams, requesting units and managers know what is pending and who must act.
Process inbox with visible statuses and next stage
View of owners, documents, bids and associated evaluations
Progress tracking without relying on email threads
Operational continuity when an owner or team changes
Lets teams manage exclusionary and evaluable criteria so they can be reused, adjusted and kept consistent across processes.
Reusable criteria catalog by procurement type
Configurable percentages, scoring options and rules
Weighting total validation before evaluation
Clear criteria for evaluators and internal control review
Consolidates operational information to review workload, progress, results and closed processes from a management view.
Indicators for open, in-evaluation and closed processes
Reports by unit, status, period and procurement type
Fast reading of rankings, admissibility and results
Information prepared for internal follow-up and control meetings
Records activity, documents, criteria and decisions to reconstruct the full process during internal review, audit or oversight.
Consultable activity history by user, date and stage
Documents and evidence associated with the procurement process
Record of applied criteria, admissibility, scores and ranking
Ordered archive for closure, operational continuity and accountability
Gets an organized view of progress, owners, criteria, bids and documents, reducing manual follow-up and rework.
Creates requests with complete, comparable data from the start, avoiding later corrections caused by missing background information.
Evaluates with clear criteria, admissibility matrices and consistent scoring, reducing the risk of calculation or evidence errors.
Reviews minutes and consolidated background information from traceable data, making validation faster and more reliable.
Accesses history, activity, documents and recorded decisions to reconstruct the process without relying on emails or isolated files.
Manages users, permissions, criteria and integrations in a centralized environment, improving operational control and system continuity.
The system structures procurement into connected stages to reduce dependency on spreadsheets, email and external documents.
Once the purchase closes, the spreadsheet downloaded from the portal is handed to the system as is: no renaming files, moving columns or formatting. And the bidders' attachments, downloaded one by one today, the system fetches on its own.
The system reads it and builds the offers table with bidders, amounts and documents.
The download happens on the server and leaves documents grouped by supplier. What took a morning takes one click.
Attachments of a closed purchase are only visible from a buyer account, so the download runs with the institution's own.
The system calculates and ranks. The buyer is the one who awards.
Pass or fail, bidder by bidder. Whoever fails does not advance, and the reason is written down.
Price, lead time, guarantees: whatever the institution evaluates, with its scoring matrix. The system calculates and ranks.
Where there is no weighting, the lowest price is proposed and goes to the requesting unit. If it does not qualify, the reason is recorded and the system proposes the next one.
Issued from the process, linked to the Mercado Público code.
The warehouse records the delivery and attaches the receipt record.
Conditional on receipt, and on whatever internal rules are configured.
What was requested, how it was evaluated, what was bought and what was received.
Law 19.886, Decree 661/2024 and ChileCompra directives. Each institution decides which ones halt the process and which only warn.
Amounts against the UTM threshold, percentages adding to one hundred, budget backing.
“Demand is not fragmented” requires human judgement, and that confirmation is recorded just the same.
That is why the system can be reviewed when the regulation changes.
Process documents can be signed with FirmaGob or another accredited provider, when the institution requires it.
If the request originates in the institution's document manager, that connection can open the process here, with no double entry.
The system exposes an API on which any platform that also has one can integrate: finance, warehouse, or whatever comes next.
This is not an account handed over and done: it is a configuration and support service. There is also a demo environment with accounts per role so the team can try it before deciding.
How the institution buys today: real stages, approvers per purchase type and internal rules.
Its route, its criteria catalogue and its documents are set up, with letterhead and signatures.
Mercado Público credentials and links to the systems already in use.
One pilot purchase walked end to end with the team, stage by stage.
Go-live and adjustments based on what shows up in real use.
Let's talk and see how to adapt our solution to your institution's processes, roles and operational needs.
Request a demo / talk